How Wilfred Owen and John Scott present ideas about slaughter and sacrifice Essay

Write a comparison of the ship canal Wilfred Owen and John Scott hand over ideas astir(predicate) slaughter and devote, how far do you agree with the view that Scotts poem is more(prenominal) effective than Owens in communicating its message?The diffexercising Off and The Drum both explore the truths about state of war outlining the horrors and cause of war through language and poetic techniques. Owen attacks the understanding between those at home who promote war as a romantic, glorious and venturesome exercise and dying for ones country as an transaction of nobility and with this who fight and die in war and who distinguish the unbowed horror of the battlefield. Scott explores the desperations caused by battle. He overly makes clear that he does non consider war as a fight of honour more as a gruesome game to see who can be more stubborn to admit what they ar doing is wrong. Both poets show corresponding thoughts about war and how it is betrayed to a glorious act of heroicness.In the fount stanzas of the drum the poets mention the profounds and tones which follow the soldiers. In The drums case it is the drums discordant sound. This instrument is used for the historical march of the soldiers. Which in this case is confound to the men. As they be parading round, and round. This gives a sense of never ratiocination war. Each day the men follow the same routine until it is there turn to face the enemy in battle. Owen immediately challenges the positive connotation of the send off in the first argument. Our first image is of impede darkening lanes. This has two meanings the first meaning is the lanes fatefully enclose the soldiers in their closeness, they cannot turn back, the second meaning is that darkening is emphasized as a metaphor of the soldiers dark destiny to which their f bewell is direct them and that is to be killed in war.John Scott dialogue about the pathetic reasons which battalion go to war. He explains how the you ng are some excited by the surrender of the opposition. To make out their liberty for charms. This line suggests that hatful would rather sell there independence for money. Regarding how it would affect their country.The alliteration used in the develop grimly gay in the send off alerts the subscribers the forced gaiety of the men and ambiguity of their supposed adventure isnt everything that is thought to be at first. Grimly Gay also contradicts the concepts of grimness and gaiety, which captures a counselling for the mixture of excitement and fear in the men and the country for which they sacrifice their lives for.Scott mentions the line ambitions voice commands. This intelligence activity ambition about represents the lives of many of the soldiers combat in the war. Either there ambition to bring round to there country or to fight for there country. It can also be in replacement for the general who commands his soldiers to war. A sense of remainder is built up in the n ext line. To March, and fight, and settle down, in foreign lands. This shows the candor of war, you can fight and put your life on the line, but you may also lie dead in the hands of the enemy and fall in there territory. The send off portrays the sense of something sinister and fateful about the operation, in the uncertainty of the mens future and in the prospect of the injured and weary return of in like manner few of them.Owen talks about how complete strangers to him went to war. They were not ours this explains how he talks about stochastic people being in the war. The imagery for the gifts of flowers for good fortune is mingled with that of flowers for a funeral wreath. It is as though the gift of flowers is the soldiers first war wound, a prelude to a course of events that must end in death.Scott shows scarce what the true meaning to war is and how it affects the life of others. He speaks of the burning towns iron out limbs windows tears. These quotations explain th e sense of horror and slaughter which took place in the Napoleonic wars. The way Scott expresses his views on the war are the tragic ways in which widows had to cope without there husband. Those who lost there homes and had to migrate to another(prenominal) area. Owen shows this kind of horror as well but not in the magnitude of Scott. As mens dead. The apostrophe in the word men shows the extensive number of soldiers who were killed.Wilfred Owen ends his poem almost like the result of a war and how they leave the allies country. Shall they return to spoiling of owing(p) bells, in wild train loads? A few, a few, too few for drums and yells. The word shall suggest that you do not really know if soldiers will return in a good way. He almost contradicts himself when he talks about loads of men returning and so he says a few. This shows that not even he is sure about the outcome of returning soldiers. Part of the soldiers betrayal is how they are dehumanized and treated so indiffer ently by the authorities that treat them. Terms such as siding-shed and train-loads creates the concept of produce rather than people being transported.The structure of the poem is broken up into stanzas with lines long and short. The shorter lines are a lot more sinister in tone which talks about ominous events that are going to happen in war. The lengthier lines are more informative. This irregularity of long and short lines and stanzas gives the poem motion which shows the lambaste of marching men and a moving train. The structure of the drum is in all different it is set out in two stanzas which echo the beat of the drum which is parading around and around. That is wherefore the use of repetition is applied for this line in both stanzas.I agree in a sense that Scotts poem is more effective on its approach to ask its message through to the reader. The reason for this being is that it can relate with the reader more because he is writing a personal response. Noticeable by the use of I this means that he can communicate in a more individual way. He also gives more ideas on what soldiers and families would have had to see through the war stages.Not only does he give a personal statement but takes into context of how it may have affected the lives of others. He also shows the gruesomeness which occurs in battle. stock-still Owen also has written a very informative poem. As he has the experience of being a solider he has more of an idea how the war worked. Unlike John Scott he did not oppose to violence. Maybe that is why Scott could have been biased towards the idea of war. Only pin pointing the parts to war which were bad, and not those which commemorate the honour and remembrance which you receive after fighting in the war.But Owen also feels the same way about the war and he has been there. I suppose these poems would not be similar because they are both from different stages of time. One which was written in the Napoleonic war and the other in world war one. That is why there is a difference in writing styles and issues which are discussed. The reason for John Scotts poem being more violent maybe because they did not use weapons like guns and explosives so battles with swords maybe have been more brutal. Taking this into consideration I think both poems have different ways in which to get there message across so they are every bit as effective.