.

Thursday, December 27, 2018

'12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose\r'

'The depiction â€Å"Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose is a drama that displays xii jurors in-depth reasoning to decide a substantial finale on the defendants sentence. there be many assets and liabilities of the convention that play a role in their decision making. The jurors be all defined in cost of their personalities, backgrounds, preconceived opinions and emotional tilts. This paper will signal that when pride, jealousy, frustration and prejudice all publish we see foolish and rational decision making methods.The assets of multitude is shown when juror#8 starts a diametric approach to grounds by showing the knife that was survey to be r ar. It starts the process of participation in puzzle solving by former(a) jury members who may have specify up their mind or were proficient feeling conformity pressure. Greater spirit of individuals total information starts to helps jury make a better decision. Liabilities of a mathematical group ar show when eve ry angiotensin converting enzyme except juror# 8 deck out their hand feeling conformity pressure. There is desire of individual shown by juror# 3 to dominate and win the lineage rather than finding a beaver solution.Lack of interest is shown by juror# 7 to reason or spend measure to adjudicate problem. There ar prejudice feelings shown by juror# 10 and 7, they study juror# 5 and 11 do not know much because of their backgrounds. from each one group determines assets and liabilities of their groups problem solving. As farseeing disagreement is not personal and is in interest of best solution its healthy. eon required to solve a problem is uncertain, members might get impatient and solve problem without reasoning. Risk taking is all good or bad depending on how a group uses it.Each group has a different problem to solve and different personalities to work with which is why each group can use assets and liabilities positively and negatively. end-to-end the film, jurywoman go is violently prejudiced against anyone who comes from a slum. â€Å"You cant believe a intelligence information they say,” he declares †take note that Juror Ten does not say â€Å"he,” message the defendant, but â€Å"they,” the group of slums as a whole. This proves that he cannot make a sightly judgment about individual guilt.Juror Nine, the major(postnominal) man with accumulated life experience, notices this and rebukes straightaway saying â€Å"Since when is dishonesty a group characteristic? ” The intolerance of Juror Ten continues before finally erupting in a long speech that leads the other jurors to avert him. The message is clear that such irrational prejudice is incompatible with justice. Juror tetrad also shows signs of such prejudice, though he couches it in more acceptable terminology: â€Å"The children who come out of slum backgrounds are potential menaces to nightclub. When a person hears the discourse prejudice, he or she might estimate it only refers to the racial prejudice a lot found between those with light fight and those with dark skin. However, prejudice runs much deeper than a persons color. Prejudice is found between gender, religion, ethnical and geographical background, and race. People have discriminated against others found upon these attributes from the beginning of time. Prejudice has become a complex problem in our society; for example, if someone were to walk in a secluded area at night and pass a group of precedential citizens, he or she will, most likely, not feel threatened.However, if instead of senior citizens, triple teenagers dressed in ripped jeans and t-shirts wearing alloy chains around their necks passed the person is more likely to feel threatened. Prejudice is the wistful truth of today’s society. Whether it’s from watching the local news or reading the newspaper, many people standstill stereotypes on the media or personal experiences. Altho ugh these are the most convenient ways to enounce someone, they are also the worst. Whenever dealing with the media, events are dramatized and slowly build into the subconscious. The affects of prejudice hence influence our decisions without us even realizing it.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment