Thursday, December 27, 2018
'12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose\r'
'The  depiction ââ¬Å"Twelve Angry Menââ¬Â by Reginald Rose is a drama that displays  xii  jurors in-depth reasoning to decide a  substantial  finale on the defendants sentence.  there  be many assets and liabilities of the  convention that play a role in their decision making. The jurors  be all defined in  cost of their personalities, backgrounds,  preconceived opinions and emotional tilts. This paper will  signal that when pride, jealousy, frustration and prejudice all  publish we see  foolish and rational decision making methods.The assets of  multitude is shown when juror#8 starts a  diametric approach to  grounds by showing the knife that was  survey to be r ar. It starts the process of participation in  puzzle solving by former(a) jury members who may have  specify up their mind or were  proficient feeling conformity pressure. Greater  spirit of individuals total information starts to helps jury make a better decision. Liabilities of a  mathematical group  ar show when eve   ry  angiotensin converting enzyme except juror# 8  deck out their hand feeling conformity pressure. There is desire of individual shown by juror# 3 to dominate and win the  lineage rather than finding a  beaver solution.Lack of interest is shown by juror# 7 to reason or spend  measure to  adjudicate problem. There  ar prejudice feelings shown by juror# 10 and 7, they  study juror# 5 and 11 do not know much because of their backgrounds.  from each one group determines assets and liabilities of their groups problem solving. As  farseeing disagreement is not personal and is in interest of best solution its healthy.  eon required to solve a problem is uncertain, members might get impatient and solve problem without reasoning. Risk taking is  all good or bad depending on how a group uses it.Each group has a different problem to solve and different personalities to work with which is why each group can use assets and liabilities positively and negatively.  end-to-end the film, jurywoman     go is violently  prejudiced against anyone who comes from a slum. ââ¬Å"You cant believe a  intelligence information they say,ââ¬Â he declares â⬠take note that Juror Ten does not say ââ¬Å"he,ââ¬Â  message the defendant, but ââ¬Å"they,ââ¬Â the group of slums as a whole. This proves that he cannot make a  sightly judgment about individual guilt.Juror Nine, the  major(postnominal) man with accumulated life experience, notices this and rebukes  straightaway saying ââ¬Å"Since when is dishonesty a group characteristic? ââ¬Â The intolerance of Juror Ten continues before finally erupting in a long speech that leads the other jurors to  avert him. The message is clear that such irrational prejudice is incompatible with justice. Juror  tetrad also shows signs of such prejudice, though he couches it in  more acceptable  terminology: ââ¬Å"The children who come out of slum backgrounds are potential menaces to   nightclub. When a person hears the  discourse prejudice, he    or she might  estimate it only refers to the racial prejudice  a lot found between those with light  fight and those with dark skin. However, prejudice runs much deeper than a persons color. Prejudice is found between gender, religion, ethnical and geographical background, and race. People have discriminated against others  found upon these attributes from the beginning of time. Prejudice has become a complex problem in our society; for example, if someone were to walk in a secluded area at night and pass a group of  precedential citizens, he or she will, most likely, not feel threatened.However, if instead of senior citizens,  triple teenagers dressed in ripped jeans and t-shirts wearing  alloy chains around their necks passed the person is more likely to feel threatened. Prejudice is the  wistful truth of todayââ¬â¢s society. Whether itââ¬â¢s from watching the local news or reading the newspaper, many people  standstill stereotypes on the media or personal experiences. Altho   ugh these are the most convenient ways to  enounce someone, they are also the worst. Whenever dealing with the media, events are dramatized and slowly build into the subconscious. The affects of prejudice  hence influence our decisions without us even realizing it.\r\n'  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment