Perspectives on Free

Perspectives on Free-Speech Zones on College Campuses EssayNaturally, many negative connotations go into along with the term save- language zone. The wording alone automatically insinuates that free speech should not be allowed everywhere, which is hardly the true intention of the idea. Sometimes the right of free speech is taken advantage of such as in certain rallies and professs, where disruptive noise, violence, and destruction often occurs. Universities make prisoner a responsibility to their students of providing a reasonably unspoilt and undisruptive environment to learn and excel in.Universities be not creating free-speech zones to limit free speech, but rather to maintain a secure atmosphere that is conducive to constriction and higher learning. Universities should be able to maintain a certain level of safety on campus in whatever way they choose. The University reserves the right to relocate or cancel the activity due to prisonbreak from excessive noise level s, traffic entanglement, or if the safety of individuals is in question (West Virginia Universitys Student vade mecum 91).They are not undermining the right of free speech that we as Americans legally hold, but are creating an reserve means for demonstrators to voice their whims without causing unnecessary disruption and chaos in inappropriate places on campus. An resultant I do have with this idea of a free-speech zone is that there isnt a exposed definition of when or where these zones should be used. Who is to say whether or not the voicing of a certain opinion or idea requires the use of a free-speech zone? If what constitutes the use of a free-speech zone was better delineate then the use of such zones could be more affective and appropriate.As stated by Robert J. Scott, protest zones have been used at many political conventions and other major events. Protest zones can be reasonable restrictions that allow free-speech rights to be expressed while decreasing safety concer ns and preventing undue disruption (Scott 92). With the account of violence and destruction that is associated with protests, it is only natural that certain precautions be taken to prevent such problems. It is overly vague to say the free expression of views or opinions may not disrupt the normal process of the university, as stated in the West Virginia Universitys student handbook.Who decides what the normal function truly is, or when it is being disrupted? If a university decides to establish the use of free-speech zones then they should be able to provide a clear and concise description of when, and for what purpose, these zones should be used. One of a universities top priorities is to make their campus as safe and secure as possible, and if free-speech zones or protest zones are what they feel are necessary to maintain that protective cover then they should be able to enforce them.The problem really comes down to whether or not these zones are used appropriately. If used e xtensively, and at levels that are unnecessary for the safety of students, then human rights issues could easily come into play. But if used in a smart way, such as for larger demonstrations of freedom of speech, standardised protests and rallies, then they could be helpful in preventing destruction and/or distraction on university campuses. Requiring those expressing dissent to pursue the law while doing so does not constitute repression (Scott 92).